Hypocrisy: A killer

“Insincerity by virtue of pretending to have qualities or beliefs that you do not really have”, is one definition of hypocrisy.

Liberals will embark on any theory that supports what they love, and more so especially if it degenerates what they hate, whether the theory has any merit.  Case in point: the cause of global warming. 

If 30% of the worlds leading scientists got together and declared that the use of the Internet contributes to mental disorders in children, liberals would accept it before asking even one question.  Most of us know why the 30% of other scientists that do not concur would not be heard.  For the same reason the other 40% who would exclaim there is insufficient data would not be heard either.  What makes this work?

If one’s only news and information source is CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, NY Times and 80% of the liberal print media, it’s hard to imagine what other point of view can be heard.  The top 100 newspapers (circulation) in the land have the attention of about 24 million people who will read the liberal-tainted, liberal-opined source, as compared to about 6 million who will read the conservative point of view.  This is not by choice as in selecting liberal or conservative, but by availability.  The same messages, based on the same liberal agenda (anti-American, pro-tax, pro-abortion, pro-euthanasia, anti-God, global warming caused by humans, promotion of racial divide, anti-gun, anti-constitution, anti-conservatism) is repeated and reinforced through the television news media.

In many polls (Harris Poll for example), no more than 20% of Americans consider themselves liberal, while 30%-40% consider themselves conservative.  Therefore, liberal voices and print media are in a ferocious battle to win the minds of the so-called independent, so-called moderate.

This constant assault on everyone, including some weak-minded independents, is based on a rigid control of news and information in an attempt to superimpose values and judgments conducive to the bias.

This method is used to pillar bad news events (9-11, Hurricane Katrina, Iraq Terrorists attacks, and the latest Virginia Tech shooting) while juxtaposing a familiar liberal theme, such as: America is to blame for 9-11; George Bush is to blame for Hurricane Katrina, terrorists are in Iraq only because America is in Iraq, and finally, guns kill people and must be banned.  There is hardly a liberal out there who would disagree with all the above absurdities.

Ann Coulter calls it a religion while Michael Savage calls it a mental disorder (Liberalism).  I’m not as talented or as educated as these two, but I submit my own theory: The Rampant Emotional Disorder (RED).  RED is manifested by use of the Emotional Mask, which is available in as many colors as there are emotions.  Wearing this Mask, the Liberal can express deep anger, while not really being angry; he can express fear, sadness, joy, disgust, surprise, curiosity, and acceptance while not really being in any of these emotional states. 

The primary reason for this is to protect their own rear-ends when they fall from acceptable behavior (future).  It explains why liberals are so lenient on criminals of all stripes, preferring to find a reason for why one person commits a crime to another that does not.  They certainly explain they are not trying to justify, but to explain “why”.  In reality, they are preparing the groundwork for their own future criminal moment.

All liberal safety nets such as welfare, government-paid health-care, and social insurance are methodically promoted under the guise of helping the poor and downtrodden.  Liberals have been helping themselves more than anyone else, while their complicit partners in the media rarely shine a light on their dark shenanigans.

Liberals are against any war (any) because they fear their own forcible involvement, no matter the valid cause and honor that calls for it.  Liberals are against guns because they realize that freedom and liberty for the masses is directly related to a public armed and capable of self-defense.  Witness Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan dictator who trained his population to fight against a possible U.S. invasion (sick) using wooden play-guns.  He wouldn’t give them real guns.

Liberals support abortion and euthanasia (government-paid if possible) because Liberals live for today, and almost exclusively for themselves.

Liberals support higher taxes because they believe in their safety nets.  They fear tax cuts exactly because they see a direct correlation to the left-wing programs.

Liberals support the notion that humans are responsible for global warming simply because it can be an anchor to slow down the spread of freedom, by slowing down economic progress and wealth-distribution through market forces.  Liberals prefer wealth-distribution through tax means because political patronage, lobbying and favors from advocacy groups can give them more power.

Rampant Emotional Disorder (RED) attenuates when:  the Liberal gets a little older while not having achieved any political prowess; he becomes involved in real-world business and begins to understand the corporate and market forces; he spends time and/or money (investment) into something, and concludes that sharing the fruits of his own success should be as per his choice (not forced); concludes that socialism has never worked anywhere on Earth, since recorded history; realizes that hypocrisy is often more transparent than expected.

A young foreigner had been fed 14 years of Liberal dogma and rhetoric; he was unable to see the beauty and majesty around him, because he accepted the dispensed misery and negative imagery from the Liberal news medium, and from the Liberal indoctrinators at schools, colleges and universities in North America.  In its hypocritical form, the same anti-American socialist perverts will never accept their part for shaping that young man’s mind and resulting suicidal and murderous attitude.

It’s not hard to conclude there will be more of this type of massacre as that of the Virginia Tech.  The fame, recognition and worst, understanding given to him via NBC’s continual broadcast of his demented video tapes, pictures and writing, is sure to encourage copy-cats and other like-minded.  He’s achieved his martyrdom legacy as grand as any terrorist would love to have.

Like a bunch of disgruntled folks sitting around at a bar all afternoon, wallowing in their personal misery while blaming anyone else but himself or herself, Liberals spew out their own in much the same way.  The furthest thing you will find during a Liberal rant is anything remotely looking like a fact.  While pretending to care and empathize about a colleague’s misery, they simply try to heap the blame on a common Liberal enemy, because they seek acceptance, lest they become total rejects.

It’s one reason while the Virginia Tech massacre is being used by Liberals to reengage the anti-gun rhetoric.  No one calls for the banning of cars when a car is used to mow down innocent by-standers waiting for a bus.  No one screams that “cars kill people” when all types of vehicles are used as mobile bombs around the world.  9-11 and Oklahoma City terrorist attacks in the US have been perpetrated with box cutters, knives, airplanes, fertilizer, and gasoline – no guns!

The maniacs out-there, spoon-fed with anti-American propaganda from all points left know full well who are the most defenseless: students.  Parents should take charge in educating their young, and should at least provide them with another option than to just stand there and wait to be shot.  Maybe schools should be showing United 93 instead of a fictional “documentary”.

Copyright (C)  2007 - Guy Michaud - All Rights Reserved